On Wed, 2013-01-16 at 13:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:18:37 -0500 > Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I'm waiting until Anaconda settles down before I pursue btrfs in > > Fedora again. Things change too much and Btrfs is too reliant on the > > anaconda part working properly to even bother trying to push it > > through at this point. Thanks, > > Well, I hope we are entering a period of bugfixing and incremental > improvement in anaconda since we have the new code in now. ;) > > FWIW, I installed with btrfs with the f18 installer and it worked fine. > (encrypted volume with / and /home subvolumes). I kept /boot as ext4 > due to a anaconda issue, which I think has already been fixed. > > So, you might want to talk to anaconda folks and get their feedback... > > kevin Did the root volume (/) Go into it's own subvolume, or is root just in /? If root isn't placed into a subvolume, say /root then mounted as /dev/sda1 subvolid=255 / lets say, you can't snapshot the root fs, which defeats the whole point of using btrfs ..... -- Sincerely, William Brown pgp.mit.edu http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x3C0AC6DAB2F928A2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
