On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely > > must be fixed before it can become the default > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. > > But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that I'm > pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to losing data and > rendering machines unbootable. I think both of us are making a subjective judgement. For myself, I "want to believe" in btrfs, having championed immutable state/wandering trees, and real databases for many years. BUT I'm deeply unhappy about data corrupting bugs being effectively ignored by upstream for months. That's not good. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
