> So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely > must be fixed before it can become the default I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that I'm pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to losing data and rendering machines unbootable. Is there an existing set of criteria that Fedora would use to determine that btrfs is sufficiently reliable to use as the default for new installs? - z -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
