On Sun, 13 Jan 2013 06:00:58 +0000 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:17:03PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:53:06 +0000 > > "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > When I did the big OCaml codegen fix/update in F18 recently, I > > > just bumped these package versions in Rawhide, merged the change > > > back to F18, and rebuilt them only in F18. The upshot is that > > > these aren't really a problem now and will fix themselves through > > > routine updates over time. > > > > Why not build them in rawhide? The codegen fix went in sooner there? > > Correct: the codegen fix was in Rawhide about 2 months before. > > > Note that in the future to avoid this: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches > > I was using git merge to keep the F18 and Rawhide histories exactly > the same. However now F18 seems to have been / be about to be > released, I'll switch. > > > Personally, I'd say just rebuild them in rawhide, since people yum > > upgrading from f18 would hit this and rawhide doesn't mind > > rebuilds. :) > > I thought that F18 packages would override Rawhide ones if the F18 > package had a greater NVR? Anyway, it'll get resolved soon. Rawhide inherits from F18 if and only if there hasn't been a Rawhide build since F-18 was branched. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
