On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 02:53:06 +0000 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When I did the big OCaml codegen fix/update in F18 recently, I just > bumped these package versions in Rawhide, merged the change back to > F18, and rebuilt them only in F18. The upshot is that these aren't > really a problem now and will fix themselves through routine updates > over time. Why not build them in rawhide? The codegen fix went in sooner there? Note that in the future to avoid this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches Personally, I'd say just rebuild them in rawhide, since people yum upgrading from f18 would hit this and rawhide doesn't mind rebuilds. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
