Re: comps' "standard" group spring cleaning?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> But I'll bite anyway: we hardly need two info readers installed by
> default, do we?

Well, I'd agree with that.  The problem (again IMHO) with "info" is that
it works for emacs users (or at least that's what I guess, I never can
figure it out), while "pinfo" operates more like a console web browser
(such as "lynx").

However, you can't remove "info", because it provides /sbin/install-info
(which is required by every package that provides info files).

I still think "pinfo" should stay.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux