On Thu, 10.01.13 11:13, Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Lennart Poettering (mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Thu, 10.01.13 09:55, Chris Adams (cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > > I noticed that comps' "standard" group includes a lot of packages that > > > > were all the hotness in 1990s but aren't really that much anymore. For > > > > example, irda-tools, pcmciautils, finger, rsh, rdist, pinfo have > > > > probably had their best times behind them, and probably shouldn't be > > > > installed by default anymore. > > > > > > pinfo is the (IMHO) best console info page reader, and until we stop > > > having man pages that say "see the info page for real documentation" > > > and/or packages that only ship info pages, pinfo should stay (and should > > > be at the same default install level as man). > > > > My mail wasn't really about the specifics what to remove but how to get > > themn removed. > > > > But I'll bite anyway: we hardly need two info readers installed by > > default, do we? > > Then remove the other one? > > With respect to the others... most could go. I honestly thought pcmciautils > was gone already, but perhaps that was for something else. Most of the > storage stuff can go too in favor of being brought in either at > installation, or by deps of other tools. How shall I proceed with this? file a feature for fesco? file a bug? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel