On 01/09/2013 04:34 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500
Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work?
And we are supposed to QA this how?
Like any software?
I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate?
I'd welcome any QA thoughts/feedback. I think we would probibly have to
have guidelines at least somewhat worked out before we could figure out
how to test things.
We could do something like what we do for packages, ie, a testing
collection and promotion to stable only happens with positive tester
feedback.
We could try and build into the process some kind of automated
testing/tooling. (search for forbidden items, runs in a virt that list
all files changed and diffs of those for review, etc.
I think QA is definitely something to keep in mind when thinking about
the rest of the process...
In one response against this thread you say
"This is not exactly what I meant... this would be things you could
run/install on any already installed Fedora. It would not have anything
to do with creating live isos... it would be just extra things for
existing installs. "
From that response I gather it is something user setup/install after
installing Fedora basically you seem to be then just duplicating and or
trying to come up with a better app installer then already exists is
that the case?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
