On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:18:36 -0500 Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:17:35PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" > wrote: > > On 01/08/2013 08:15 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >So, what do folks think? Workable? Crazy? Crazy enough to work? > > And we are supposed to QA this how? > > Like any software? > > I'm not sure I understand the question, actually. Can you elaborate? I'd welcome any QA thoughts/feedback. I think we would probibly have to have guidelines at least somewhat worked out before we could figure out how to test things. We could do something like what we do for packages, ie, a testing collection and promotion to stable only happens with positive tester feedback. We could try and build into the process some kind of automated testing/tooling. (search for forbidden items, runs in a virt that list all files changed and diffs of those for review, etc. I think QA is definitely something to keep in mind when thinking about the rest of the process... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
