On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 01:56 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 01/07/2013 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue > > to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately. > > Ah I see but it's ok when you do... What have I escalated that was not a high-level technical decision? > > There's no high-level technical > > decision to be made here. The bugs just need to get fixed. FESCo doesn't > > have magical resources to achieve this, it's a decision-making body. > > Fesco set an example here [1] > > "At today's FESCo meeting we agreed to: > > AGREED: Kay should make sure all the packages affected to use the new > config files. > > Kay, can you please make sure all affected packages are fixed up asap? > Thanks." > > I would expect they to be consistent in their action and request of the > apache maintainer that he should fix up all the affected packages as well... Well, I'm not sure that was a great precedent to set, if we're going to treat it as a precedent... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
