On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 15:47 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 01/07/2013 02:54 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > > 2 months ago I have open a bug tracker for all packages with an apache > > configuration file, which need to be fixed to work with httpd 2.4. > > > > The current situation, 1 week before release, don't seems really good, > > see > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=871373&hide_resolved=1 > > > > 16 packages are still "NEW", nott even acked by the maintainer > > (and I just pushed 10 fixed packages to updates) > > > > Some seems so broken, and unmaintained (ex zikula) that they should > > probably be removed from the distro. > > Escalate this issue to FESCO Why? What can FESCo do about it? We don't need to kick every damn issue to FESCo, as seems to be a trend lately. There's no high-level technical decision to be made here. The bugs just need to get fixed. FESCo doesn't have magical resources to achieve this, it's a decision-making body. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
