On Fri, 2013-01-04 at 22:52 +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2013-01-04 14:07 (GMT-0700) Chris Murphy composed: > > > > > >> Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > >>> unbelieveable how many time and code was spent in the last > >>> years to make a shiny boot hide anything from the users > >>> because they could look and learn what their systems does > > > > > >> Right. Crazy that hoods and nacelles were ever invented. Everyone should > >> want to drive something like this to the grocery store. > >> http://tinyurl.com/a3x7p5y > > > > > > Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. That image to me is a lot more > > enticing than the recent crop of SUVs, and than the various means of hiding > > from me the plain text messages that tell me something useful about what is > > actually happening while waiting on init to complete. > > Buy a SSD, disable the crap that we still enable by default but you > probably don't need / use anyway ... and you don't have to wait at all > ;) Apart from all the bullshit about cars, which part of "it's part of upstream grub2" are you people not understanding? This is not our code. This is how grub2-mkconfig works. We are not going to get into the game of patching bootloader behaviour downstream again. You don't want grub2 to generate nested menus by default, you can go upstream and argue with the grub developers. Please keep this crap out of Fedora lists. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
