Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 2.1.2013 12:08, Stijn Hoop napsal(a):
Hi,

On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it, since it cannot be
installed system wide while manage Ruby locally, as discussed here
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rubyversionmanager/RuMA7Jl1EDk/8wv5tncWBJkJ
Out of curiosity, the RVM page [1] and other google hits [2], [3] talk
about "mixed mode install" that seems to be exactly what you want. I'm
not much of a ruby / RVM user, but does it not work?

--Stijn

[1] https://rvm.io/rvm/install/
[2] https://blog.engineyard.com/2012/rvm-stable-and-more/
[3] http://serverfault.com/questions/424546/rvm-mixed-mode-local-gem-installation

Well, once I had been asking upstream similar question and I was pointed to some environment variables [1], which might influence RVM behavior, but I do not remember anymore what was the showstopper for me at that time. They are probably called mixed mode now, but I have never tried it personally.


Vít


[1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rubyversionmanager/7K3y4A8B4XQ/QY8pXTjj3k8J
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux