Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Sigh ... now there are *three* incompatible Ruby syntax / semantics "standards" to deal with.

Don't spread FUD please.

Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)

There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it, since it cannot be installed system wide while manage Ruby locally, as discussed here [1]. Moreover, upstream is not very keen to see RVM packaged, since they think that '$ \curl -L https://get.rvm.io | bash -s stable --ruby' is super easy and super intuitive.


Vít


[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/rubyversionmanager/RuMA7Jl1EDk/8wv5tncWBJkJ
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux