On 12/07/2012 11:53 PM, Tomas Radej wrote: > One of the results was a conversation I had with a few guys to > whom I recommended Fedora as a development environment. It showed me > that there's indeed something wrong. While they all said that Fedora's > features were brilliant, they unanimously rejected Fedora as a > primary system. The reason they gave me was, now quoting: It doesn't > really work. I know this is an old thread, but I'm curious as to what didn't "really work" for them. Was it instability? Lack of media support? Non-free software like nvidia drivers or flash? Devices not working, lack of proprietary firmware? Problems/complications with the installer? The one thing that I personally think is missing is excellent upgrade support between releases via the package manager (and I know that Richard has been working on this with packagekit). This might make Fedora more attractive. I'm also surprised to read of lots of people saying Fedora is not reliable as I have rarely had any problems, certainly less than I recall having on Ubuntu. -c -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
