Re: Why samba-client not installed by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 19.12.2012 20:26, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> 
> On Dec 19, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>
>> and i would file a bug if something pulls samba-client as
>> dependency - there are still WAY too much useless dependencies
>> like colord and i refuse to accept more of them!
> 
> If you have a b&w display and only b&w printers, then colord would 
> still enable something useful. But I suspect you have at least one color display

and if you would have rears you would be a car

the point is that optional features should never be a hard
dependency - as example the colord crap pulls X11 deps on
servers because you install Imagemagick which is a COMMANDLINE
tool in the first front



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux