Re: Why samba-client not installed by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 19.12.2012 17:58, schrieb drago01:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am 19.12.2012 15:29, schrieb Ozan Çağlayan:
>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:08 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> because most people the days are using network-printers
>>>> even the cheap HP printers having WLAN/LAN and working without
>>>> any windows crap
>>>
>>> Agree but it doesn't change the fact that there are still plenty of
>>> printers shared through Windows.
>>
>> maybe, but you have to read manuals all the time and can not
>> expect to have anything working out-of-the-box, there are
>> even people not owning a printer at all
> 
> I disagree you should not have to read manuals all the time to do
> basic tasks like printing.

printing OVER SAMBA is NOT a basic task
it is not common for the normal enduser

it may be common in company networks
but there should nobody have to add a printer by himself

> @Ozan: File a bug and ask for the dep to be added

and i would file a bug if something pulls samba-client as
dependency - there are still WAY too much useless dependencies
like colord and i refuse to accept more of them!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux