Re: [@core] minimal install size assessment, f17 vs. f18

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19 December 2012 10:58, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 18:34 +0100, Thomas Bendler wrote:
>> 2012/12/18 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>         Just for interest, here's the current (and likely final) state
>>         of
>>         minimal install package set for f18 vs. f17.
>>         [...]
>>
>>
>> Can you also point to a page with the hole list of packages in
>> minimal? Otherwise you need to know what was allready in minimal back
>> in f17.
>
> Oh dear, sorry, I just rebooted and lost that data (I tend to keep this
> kind of file in /tmp). I could re-generate it if you're really
> interested.


:). I see what you did just there :)

In actuallity.. I was wondering more about the size differences than
the number of packages. That is what usually gets the complaints.


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
"Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it."
Linus Torvalds
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me."  —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux