On 10 December 2012 16:02, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:28:22 +0000, Ian Malone wrote: > >> >> > > I think this is not good - every contributor should be subscribed >> >> > > to >> >> > > announce list (with cla_done). >> >> > >> >> > So you're blaming people who didn't recieve the email they expected >> >> > on >> >> > devel-announce@ for not recieving it? Seems pretty off. >> >> >> >> No, definitely not - I missed forgot one important word - automatically >> >> subscribed when members of CLA group. >> >> >> >> Sorry for confusion. >> > >> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Join_the_important_Mailing_Lists >> > >> >> It's probably sensible to be subscribed to announce if you're a >> contributor, but not all contributors are package maintainers, so this >> isn't quite sufficient. > > Did anyone claim that? - No. > > Years ago I've suggested creating a list where to address all contributors. > One list that would be mandatory to subscribe to. > Not multiple lists. > Sorry, I misunderstood. You mailed with only a link to a page for people wishing to become package maintainers and the section listing mailing lists that package maintainers should be subscribed to. It seemed you were suggesting that as a solution to the problem. Your follow up email makes it clearer that you were intending to take a very different position (that there are too many lists with not well enough defined purposes), but it's hard to extract that from this link only. -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
