----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 02:57 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > Packaging two parallel versions of interpreters brings not only the > > burden of maintaining them, but also the work to make them not > > conflict. E.g. renaming binaries, checking shebangs all the time, > > etc. > > With SCLs, this is much simpler and more transparent (my POV). I > > don't > > think Fedora's Ruby-SIG is going to do that. > > > Are you simply saying that you're not going to care for the issue > making > 2 SCL that depends on different version of Ruby simply not > installable > in parallel ? > Or are you saying that the SCL will be confined in its own 'root' so > they will not conflict ? > I don't think I fully understand your question here. Every SCL is confined in its own root under /opt/.../name/root. So you can either do two SCLs, each with different Ruby version; one SCL with version different then what's in the system; or place both versions into the system, where I see the significant maintenance burden. The last option is the only currently possible in Fedora, but Ruby-SIG is not going to do that. Does that answer it? > Simo. > > -- > Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
