On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 02:57 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Packaging two parallel versions of interpreters brings not only the > burden of maintaining them, but also the work to make them not > conflict. E.g. renaming binaries, checking shebangs all the time, etc. > With SCLs, this is much simpler and more transparent (my POV). I don't > think Fedora's Ruby-SIG is going to do that. > Are you simply saying that you're not going to care for the issue making 2 SCL that depends on different version of Ruby simply not installable in parallel ? Or are you saying that the SCL will be confined in its own 'root' so they will not conflict ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
