Re: LibRaw: possible license issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 07:40:10PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:

> I am not familiar with gstreamer's internals, but AFAIIK, these
> plugins aren't linked, but "dlopen'ed".
> 
> Otherwise these "plugins" would not be "plugins" ;)

The difference is an implementation detail, and so depending on it for 
legal purposes is a stretch. However, as far as *we're* concerned, I 
don't think there's a problem - everything we ship would be fine with 
GPLv3, and any additional combinations occur at the user's end. Upstream 
may care due to distributions with different policies, but I don't know 
that that's a discussion we need to have here.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux