On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 11:15 -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:14:08AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Btw. Thanksgiving conflict is known, but we decided not to move > > Go/No-Go to Wednesday because of limited time for testing, let me > > know in case of (strong) objections. > > I really think having this meeting during the second largest US holiday > is a very poor idea, especially since almost everybody working on > anything we're likely to decide no-go for is in the US, as are many of > the people whose views will be needed. > > Also note that even if they can show up /sometime on Thanksgiving day/, > which is unlikely enough to begin with, many if not most families > celebrate with a mid-afternoon meal. That's right where this meeting is > scheduled for. I was one who slightly favoured Thursday. As Jaroslav said, the reasoning is that this week the extra day could be *really important*, with the timing of the fedup work. We are aiming to build RC1 today; realistically speaking the chances that fedup works perfectly first time are not high, so I was figuring on needing at least an RC2. Given that, Wednesday seemed over-optimistic to do the meeting. I think it's understood that we won't make a controversial Go call on Thursday; it'll be either a clear Go, otherwise slip. We could have a pre-meeting-meeting on wednesday to evaluate the current state at that time, I guess, to feed into the thursday meeting. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
