On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/20/2012 07:45 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Panu Matilainen
<pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pmatilai@laiskiainen.org>> wrote:
Now that FESCo accepted
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/__Features/RPM4.11
<http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.11> for F19... (in what
might well be a record time - less than a minute in the meeting from
proposal to acceptance :)
Rpm 4.11 alpha (or actually post-alpha snapshot to pull in a few
accumulated fixes + enhancements) will be hitting rawhide shortly.
There's no soname bump involved this time, so no rebuilds required.
There's one thing that does affect nearly every package: new
warnings about bogus spec changelog dates. The most common cause is
the day name not matching the given date, such as:
warning: bogus date in %changelog: Tue Jun 03 2009 Panu Matilainen
<pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx>> - 4.7.0-5
Jun 03 2009 was Wednesday, not Tuesday, hence the warning. As rpm
hasn't hasn't previously validated changelog dates make sense as a
whole, nearly every spec has one or more of these mistakes. It's
just a warning though and doesn't cause build failures.
Other than that, chances are you wont notice much anything at all.
Assuming all goes well that is. So its the usual drill: keep your
eyes open on rawhide builds and report any new oddities found ASAP.
I'm not expecting any major issues with this but you never really know.
For further details see the draft release notes at
http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/__4.11.0
<http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.11.0>
I can't build the latest wesnoth in rawhide, but I can in all older
releases. Fails because some of the data is missing.
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9837/4709837/build.log
Is this RPM related?
I would say no: if you compare the early parts of the build.log between f19 and eg f18 build, in the successful build the translations directory and its contents gets created in a big big pile of 'mo-update' calls:
-- Build files have been written to: /builddir/build/BUILD/wesnoth-1.10.5
Scanning dependencies of target mo-update
[ 0%] mo-update [zh_TW]: Creating locale directory.
[ 0%] mo-update [af]: Creating locale directory.
[ 0%] mo-update [ang]: Creating locale directory.
[ 0%] mo-update [ang@latin]: Creating locale directory.
[ 0%] mo-update [ar]: Creating locale directory.
[ 0%] Scanning dependencies of target wesnoth-lua
...but in the f19 build, no such thing occurs:
-- Build files have been written to: /builddir/build/BUILD/wesnoth-1.10.5
Scanning dependencies of target wesnoth-lua
[ 0%] Scanning dependencies of target wesnoth-core
[...]
I thought not, but wanted to be sure. It certainly f19-centric. Thanks!
And if anyone see something obvious here let me know.
-J
And if anyone see something obvious here let me know.
-J
- Panu -
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
