Le mardi 13 novembre 2012 à 16:10 -0500, Matthew Miller a écrit : > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 03:47:25PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Given the move of most system configuration at a large scale to things > > such as puppet and chef, I suspect that this argument has already lost in > > the marketplace. Obviously, we should still support more locked down > > configurations for the sites that need it, but programmatic application > > of system configuration is likely to stay. > > > > At least in the puppet/chef/etc cases you can tell when the system has > > fallen out of the config, but other than a diff/hash you're not going to be > > able to programmatically determine what it being out of configuration means > > for the system operation itself. > > Doesn't this make things _worse_ for puppet and chef and friends? When using > those systems, it's nice to do the programmatic config and that level, and > have easily-tweaked key value (or single value per file!) configuration. No, you can just use a template and hide it behind the proper abstraction. it make things worse for stuff like augeas however. -- Michael Scherer -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
