Re: RPM specfiles for commercial packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 06:04:54PM -0400, Alan Cox wrote:

> My misunderstanding then. I've seen that used to refer to cases where the
> package contains binaries of proprietary code that you don't get src.rpm for

Yeah, I was thinking of software were the distributed binary stuff
are the actual "Source" files in the rpm that you left out with
the "NoSource" tags.

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux