Re: RPM specfiles for commercial packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 08:39:36PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> > That assumes you have the right to redistribute the binary and are not
> > just doing internal packaging.  Windows/XP.nosrc.rpm will get me a rude
> > letter and a visit from the boys with truncheons
> 
> Uhh... the norsrc.rpm's do not include the binaries-that-may-not-be-
> redistributed, so what's the problem?

My misunderstanding then. I've seen that used to refer to cases where the
package contains binaries of proprietary code that you don't get src.rpm for


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux