Re: RPM specfiles for commercial packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 13:01 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> Commercial software is an evil some of us have to live with and as

Please, don't confuse commercial with proprietary.

    http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#Commercial

Free Software can be just as commercial as proprietary software.

All it takes is being used in a commercial context.

I'm sorry for the waves, but this kind of mistakes propagate the FUD
that Free Software can't be used for business.

Thanks for your attention, Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux