Re: RPM specfiles for commercial packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:04:41PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 14:01, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > Commercial software is an evil some of us have to live with and as
> > long as I have no choice I figured I'd try and make it as painless as
> > possible.  So I've been packaging the various commercial software
> > around into Fedora-friendly RPMs so that I can move away from an NFS
> > or rsync-ed /usr/local.  So far I've done Matlab R14sp1, Mathematica
> > 5, the PGI compiler suite and RealPlayer.  (OK, RealPlayer was already
> > an RPM but doing everything in a postinstall script is pretty nasty.)
> > I doubt there up to proper Fedora standards but at least they work.
> > 
> > Is anyone else doing this?  Is there a place where we can exchange
> > specfiles?
> 
> We have:
> mathematica
> matlab r13 and r14
> maple
> nag and absoft fortran compilers
> 
> among others.
> 
> I don't think there is a place to exchange spec files, though there is
> nothing keeping you from posting yours or posting a .nosrc. rpm.

ATrpms would *love* to host nosrc.rpm/specfiles for
numerical/engineering packages!

Get me those mathematica/matlab/maple and nag specfiles now! 8-)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpmIc51SaPrL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux