Jaroslav Reznik píše v Po 12. 11. 2012 v 04:52 -0500: > ----- Original Message ----- > > Matthew Miller píše v Čt 08. 11. 2012 v 15:15 -0500: > > > So, here's a proposal for a semi-informal group linking different > > > stakeholders interested in curating the @core package selection: > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Minimal_Core > > > > > > Please comment and join if you're interested. This is intended to > > > be a > > > request for comments and input rather than a finish document. > > > > > > Note that "Minimal Core" isn't meant to necessarily imply "minimal > > > possible > > > distribution". I would have just called it "Fedora Core", if we > > > didn't > > > already have a lot of baggage around that name. It means "minimal > > > for us", > > > and the group's mission is defining exactly what that means, and > > > estabilishing sensible standards around that. > > > > > > Basically, we have the various desktop SIGs which decide what goes > > > into > > > those package sets, and it's reasonable to have one for core as > > > well. > > > > Maybe such groups could exist for all top-level groups in comps? > > > > And yes, I'm interested in this SIG. > > How will be Core SIG related to Server SIG? As a basis for Server SIG > work? As far as I can see what you wanted to achieve with this SIG > is now covered partially in Core SIG. it's correct there is an overlap, but it will allow the Server SIG (when alive again) to concentrate on the higher level stuff (like organizing the servers in comps to be easier accessible) while the Core SIG will care of the common lowest denominator. And is also answers the question where the Server begins = on top of Core. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
