On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:58:59PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 11/08/2012 05:56 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >It turns out that software development is hard. It's especially hard > >when you have a hugely complicated system with no central management and > >no real incentive for most of the skilled workers to cooperate on > >sections of the project that influence each other. It's nigh-near > >impossible when you have the same set of people tasked to simultaneously > >stabalise an upcoming release and do the development work for the > >forthcoming release. The miracle isn't that Anaconda is taking longer > >than desirable. It's that it's as close to finished as it is. > > Is it not just time to form a "CoreOS" SIG which include Anaconda, > the storage developers, The kernel, Dracut,/Systemd/Udev, and > arguably selinux and the network guys as well to ensure "proper" > communication of changes between teams responsible for "core" ( > installation/boot/network handling ) functionality within the > project? Whatever we call it, I agree that we need a formal process to make sure all of these components are on the same page and aware of what each other is doing. -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Manager, Installer Engineering Team Red Hat, Inc. | Westford, MA | EST5EDT -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
