On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:59:19 +0100 Alec Leamas <leamas.alec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It might be that you are right, dunno, this is just so weird. My > point is just that three simple reviews might be less work than to > discuss this until there is a Proper Solution. The guideline is: If the package is "Retired" in pkgdb, in general it needs a re-review. (Sometimes exceptions are made right after the per cycle mass retirement for things that were mistakenly retired, etc). If it's "Orphaned" you can just take ownership and go on. I'll look at fixing the wiki kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
