Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 7.11.2012 10:21, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 11/07/2012 09:49 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.11.2012 16:04, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
On 11/06/2012 02:24 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 6.11.2012 14:17, Aleksandar Kurtakov napsal(a):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vít Ondruch" <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2012 2:56:18 PM
Subject: Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

So give me the permission [1] as well as the others who requested it
before me.

Apparently the current owner doesn't care. You can compare the
version
history in koji [2] and [3] and if he doesn't care about one package,
it
is reasonable to doubt that the other packages will be in better
state.
The problem here is that pkgdb requests are not auto approved after
some timeout period if the maintainer hasn't reacted.

That would be sweet if it would be auto approved.

Do you want a backdoor permitting all script kidz and overzealous, but
unexperienced newcomers to automatically take over packages?

Come on, there are the same alarmist who think that Wikipedia will be
hijacked and destroyed but have it happened any time?

Well, you might not be aware about it, but at least de.wikipedia.org does have similiar problems as we are discussing here.

You are still maintainer, you are still owner and you are notified by
email about every change in your package, so you'll be able to catch
such activity pretty soon and act accordingly.

You get notified when the damage is done

Definitely, we are not in age of Minority Report yet, but even Pre-crime had its issues.

, e.g. when your spec file has been modified to your dissatisfaction and when the package already has entered rawhide.

All that's left to you unless these changes immediately break something, is to either silently swallow these changes or to revert them sometime later.

I usually either missed or forgot about the request or deliberately do
not yet want to approve.
That said, what I feel is missing in Fedora's pkgdb web-forms is an
option to "leave a comment to applicant" and an "some automated
reminder mechanisms" to remind "approvers" about pending requests.

There is bugzilla, but it is definitely not the most flexible tool on
the world.
Wrt. bugzilla, similar considerations apply: BZ-mails are sent out once and therefore are easy to forget/miss.


Ralf


--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux