Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 00:26:08 +0100,
  Michael Scherer <misc@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Le samedi 03 novembre 2012 à 07:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :

I do not run it, so I cannot judge, but I think the first step to fix
something is to know the exact problems to fix. If the issue is "too
much breakage", how can we ensure the most annoying issues are prevented
( I am pretty confident in autoQA personnaly ) ?

Well one issue is packagers not doing rawhide builds. This has two issues. One is that rawhide doesn't pick up fixes in updates-testing so doesn't get the latest updates. The other is that the packages aren't built against rawhide libraries which can cause breakage when libraries change.

And also, if rawhide start to be more used, we should ensure if doesn't
divde the community in 2 groups ( as I have seen some people complain on
others distributions that stable release are neglected because devs run
"$dev_distro" and not the stable release )

In Fedora's case the problem is reversed. Rawhide doesn't get enough attention.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux