Re: Revamping the non responsive maintainer process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Surely if an individual has not logged into for several months into our 
> infrastructure he must be inactive no?

I maintain just a couple of low-overhead packages, and I haven't changed
either in a couple of years.  The only time I've logged into any of the
Fedora servers in that time has been related to mirror management (and
that is pretty rare as well).

And (because I'm a lazy email reader) I post here from a different email
address than my Fedora-registered one.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux