On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wasn't referring to gwibber at all, I was referring to writing a GUI for libraries we already have to replace the functionality that gwibber provides.
Peter
On 11/01/2012 09:22 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> On 10/31/2012 08:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Only one package depends on any of these: gwibber depends on dee. So
> > someone interested in gwibber might want to pick up dee.
>
> I'll take dee, although, gwibber will never progress past 3.6, because
> the upstream (Canonical) plan is to convert gwibber into a "friends"
> client (https://launchpad.net/friends), and I don't think that will
> likely end up in Fedora.
>
>
> Someone writing a frontend to libsocialweb would likely provide
> equivalent functionality to gwibber and libsocialweb already is
> integrated into things like gnome-online-accounts so it could be
> relatively straight forward.
I talked to gwibber upstream and they do not plan to ever support GOA.
I wasn't referring to gwibber at all, I was referring to writing a GUI for libraries we already have to replace the functionality that gwibber provides.
Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
