Re: HEADUP for all PEAR packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/23/2012 06:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:


Am 23.10.2012 17:57, schrieb Remi Collet:
Le 23/10/2012 17:45, Reindl Harald a écrit :

because i never found all used packages as RPM

And ?
What are you waiting for?

what should i wait for?
"pear install whatever"

pear itself is a package-system which should not be wrapped
in another one - the rpm-db overhead with a lot of files
is mostly larger than the scripts itself.....
I couldn't disagree more.
Using a centralized packaging system has the benefit to be able to install an exact version on all managed hosts. Show me, how to do that with pear.
Is pear also able to answer you: to which package belongs file ....?

I'd even propose to disable other packaging systems in Fedora, or to change them to prompt the user:

"Yes, I know this voids warranty and I'll take the risk"

(or something like that).

Pear is here just a example, but there are other package systems in fedora as well: python-pip, I know there's something similar in ruby (gem?),...


--
Matthias Runge <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
               <mrunge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux