On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 21:22 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > Doesn't that come down to "it's random" in the combined case? > > > > Well, not exactly. It's in actual install order. So if you > > > But what if it's done by anaconda? > > You can do a multiple desktop install with a kickstart file. That's one > > of the 'what ifs'. And in that case, you won't really know which DM will > > get enabled. But is it really a big deal? You'll get *a* DM enabled, at > > This is the case I'm thinking of, for university computer labs. > > It seems like having the preset policy RPMs to make the decision > deterministic is a good idea. Well if you're using a kickstart anyway, you can just stick a systemctl enable command in %post, can't you? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
