On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 06:07:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Doesn't that come down to "it's random" in the combined case? > > > Well, not exactly. It's in actual install order. So if you > > But what if it's done by anaconda? > You can do a multiple desktop install with a kickstart file. That's one > of the 'what ifs'. And in that case, you won't really know which DM will > get enabled. But is it really a big deal? You'll get *a* DM enabled, at This is the case I'm thinking of, for university computer labs. It seems like having the preset policy RPMs to make the decision deterministic is a good idea. > least. A lot of the time you probably aren't going to care which one you > get. If you do care, it's one command to change it. We just decided it > really wasn't going to ruin anyone's day in the end. Any time you're I can see it making someone annoyed and frustrated.... > installing multiple desktops, you're letting yourself in for a certain > amount of configuration work anyhow. How so? -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
