On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:19:59PM -0700, J. Randall Owens wrote:
> Just on the naming, I'd rather steer clear of the actual concept, let me
> get this straight: You want a group called "adm", presumably short for
> "administrator", the point of which is that it can view system things,
> but not actually *administer* them? Why on Earth call it "adm"?
The group is already there, so it's not a big stretch, but I agree the
naming is confusing when used in this way. ("wheel" isn't exactly
straightforward either, but at least it's Traditional.)
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
