On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 15:38 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/09/2012 03:30 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 05:24:42PM +0200, Richard Marko wrote: > >>> Compared to the other things I mentioned this is less important (because > >>> hey, sysadmins can learn new ways!), but I wanted to elaborate on where this > >>> is coming from. > >> +1. For example swapping action and name parameters for systemctl > >> compared to service calls is just annoying. > > Yes. Again, you're not the first person I've heard this from. Likewise, > > needing to fill out the .service extension. Both make a certain logical > > sense from a design point of view, but they're not putting the user first. > > Probably changing this is not doable since you have multiple types of > units that can have the same name foo.path foo.target foo.service > foo.timer etc. > > As I have set from the get go it is best for administrator and users > alike to forget all they know of the legacy sysv init stuff and approach > systemd with a fresh mind and as a *new* technology Oh come on, you just use a default when it is missing (.service) and require it fully formed for the others. Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
