Re: Confusing tracker bug naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Samstag, den 06.10.2012, 23:47 +0000 schrieb Andre Robatino:
> Here was my proposal:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Trackers

For the list: Robin's proposal is
      * 15Alpha, 15Beta and 15Final (or alternatively 15) 
      * 15AlphaNTH, 15BetaNTH and 15FinalNTH (or alternatively 15NTH)

So we agree that having two different labels for one thing (NTH and
accepted) is confusing and that 'accepted' is even worse because it can
be confused with the whiteboard statuses.

I think just a number (like 15) is not enough. The advantage I see for
my proposal is that the it is consistent not only throughout the names
of the tracker bugs but throughout both bug names and whiteboard
statuses: Blocker in the whiteboard can only exist in a Blocker bug.

But this is only a minor difference that I don't really care about as
long as we get change the current 'accepted' names. :)

Best regards,
Christoph


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux