Confusing tracker bug naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently Blocker bugs are named "F<release><milestone>":
      * FXXAlpha
      * FXXBeta
      * FXXBlocker
To indicate whether something was accepted as a blocker or not the
whiteboard is used: AcceptedBlocker or RejectedBlocker

Nice-to-have bugs are named "F<release><milestone>-accepted":
      * FXXAlpha-accepted
      * FXXBeta-accepted
      * FXX-accepted
To indicate whether something was accepted as a nice-to-have or not
again the whiteboard is used: AcceptedNTH or RejectedNTH.

This is inconsistent and confusing:
     1. Blocker bugs for alpha and beta don't have "blocker" in their
        name but the final has.
     2. Naming the NTH bugs "-accepted" can be easily confused with the
        whiteboard status and sounds like an accepted blocker, but not
        like only nice-to-have.

Therefor I propose:
      * F<release><Milestone>Blocker, that is FXXAlphaBlocker,
        FXXBetaBlocker, FXXBlocker.
      * F<release><Milestone>NTH, that is FXXAlphaNTH, FXXBetaNTH,
        FXXNTH
      * Whiteboard remains unchanged.

Questions, feedback, thoughts or rants anybody?

Kind regards,
Christoph

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux