Am 26.09.2012 06:05, schrieb Daniel Veillard: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 05:14:58PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 10:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > [...] >> I think some of Harald's other suggestions in the mail are pretty good, >> though. It does seem like yum could try harder to throw out slow >> mirrors. It is a bit annoying when you're sitting on a 50Mb/sec >> connection getting about 200Kb/sec from some sclerotic mirror... > > So just imagine when you have 4Mbps and getting not even half a kbps > from the server and unable to even kill that update because if you do > the damn thing will restart from scratch from the same server and at > the same speed. That's the current situation here ! 200Kb/sec is > very fast compared to what yum serves us, there are server that fast > but yum will stick indefinitely with slow servers. And a fast server > today will be a slow one tomorrow depending on the ISP own evaluation > of the traffic pattern. yes, and that is why statistics of mirrors are meaningsless because of this fact my idea to give us a config-option "dear yum, if the selected mirror provides lower than 500 KB/sek try another one because my line can 12 MB/sec" keep also in mind that a usually fast mirror may have too much load and that is why he is so slow - one reason more to switch ASAP to another one
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
