-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/25/2012 03:23 PM, Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:58 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report > <rawhide@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Broken deps for i386 >> ---------------------------------------------------------- > [snip] >> [policycoreutils] policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-2.fc19.i686 requires >> libselinux.so.1()(64bit) policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-2.fc19.i686 >> requires libcgroup.so.1(CGROUP_0.34)(64bit) >> policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-2.fc19.i686 requires >> libcgroup.so.1(CGROUP_0.32)(64bit) >> policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-2.fc19.i686 requires >> libcgroup.so.1()(64bit) policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-2.fc19.i686 >> requires libcap-ng.so.0()(64bit) >> policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-2.fc19.i686 requires >> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) > > Out of curiosity, just how did a package with 64-bit dependencies get into > the 32-bit repo? Those libraries shouldn't be available in the buildroot, > right? (Already filed as > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859517, by the way.) > The tar ball included a prebuild binary which I have cleaned up in policycoreutils-sandbox-2.1.13-3.fc19.i686 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlBjHNYACgkQrlYvE4MpobMHqwCeJXnJBW0b/NqeSJT1kr2JjX6n mBAAoIeKnZP+kOauaXkUjwS78e0HPkYo =UUMs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
