On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:33:56 +0200 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wrote: > > 3. If the user did not have some of the packages in the group > > installed, explicitly listing them installs them, which is usually > > not what the user wants. > > Oops, sorry, I just tested this, I was wrong about that one. But that > in turn means that if the user had only subpackages installed, those > will NOT be upgraded by the command Bodhi suggested (which only lists > the main packages) even if there are versioned Requires between the > main package and the subpackage(s). > > (That can be "fixed" by using "install" instead of "update", but then > you're left with the problem from my original point 3.) > > Using the --advisory switch solves this problem nicely. Sounds nice... Could you file a bodhi ticket on this? https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/newticket Thanks, kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
