On 08/29/2012 03:17 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote: > Why Did You Do This?! > > Do we really need yet another network management thing? > ======================================================= ... > We've got Network Manager, which is also doing it's job nicely and won't > give you any headaches if you prevent it from stepping on anybody else's > toes. Or try to make it manage a thousand devices, like on System z. > > *** Network Manager is just another daemon created for a task > which historically often did not need any daemons. It's almost as if > the new generation of Unix hackers wants to redo everything - > in x10 or x100 times bloated and more complex way than it was done > before. Yes, guys, old stuff has problems and limitations. But > switching into high gear and writing a ton of stuff is not a solution > I like. Can you *think it through* and fix/improve stuff WITHOUT > increasing its complexity tenfold as a minimum? Yes, I do realize > that elegant solution is harder to do than coding spree solution, > but I still hope... It all happened before, and it will happen again: http://www.drdobbs.com/article/print?articleId=225701475&dept_url=/windows/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
