Re: Mass changes to packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 13:24:53 -0400,
  Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

which should not do anything on an update.  It would auto-enable if
you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
but that isn't what you're describing.  File a bug maybe?

I'll need to keep better track. There are some cases where I do a reinstall. If there is version conflict for an update, I will sometimes remove the conflicting packages in order to test the update. Then later I'll put back removed packages after they have been updated so as not to conflict any more. So I might be seeing a combination of this case and upgrades between Fedora releases.

I'm still hoping that the new feature will let me set a policy of nothing new getting installed should be on by default.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux