Re: Mass changes to packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Yeah, it gets old pretty quick when every time some packages get updated,
>>> one needs to enable or disable them again.

>> Huh?  That doesn't happen given the current (F16/F17) scriptlets AFAICS.
>> They don't touch the service's enable state.

> Maybe what I am seeing is something different. I certainly have services 
> turn back on after updates that I have disabled. sendmail is one example.

Hm, that seems pretty odd.  sendmail's %post script is

%post
if [ $1 -eq 1 ] ; then
# Initial installation
	/bin/systemctl enable sendmail.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
	/bin/systemctl enable sm-client.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
	/bin/systemctl daemon-reload >/dev/null 2>&1 || :
fi

which should not do anything on an update.  It would auto-enable if
you were installing the package when it was previously not present,
but that isn't what you're describing.  File a bug maybe?

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux