Re: redhat-lsb-desktop versus transition to current libpng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 08/01/2012 10:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What this means, IMO, is that we need to split out libpng12 as a
>> separate package.  The current hack that I'm using (bundling 1.2 and 1.5
>> into a single SRPM) was never meant to be more than a very short-term
>> stopgap; I'm sure it violates all sorts of packaging guidelines.

> Rather than working around the review process, just go ahead and make
> the package, upload it somewhere, open a review ticket, and I'll review
> it after lunch today. I'm familiar with that package, so it should be a
> very quick review for me to complete, and the branching request should
> be able to be processed today.

Thanks for offering!  Review request is in bug #845110

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux